Chapter 1: Introduction and overview
This idea is so common to me that
seeing it in writing and related to ones quest for happiness suprised me.
While I am usually frustrated with having to “plan” for the future I have never
really question it. As a teenager I
always argued with my parents about preparing for college and jobs. I hated it, but I did it because I knew I had
to. Now I am guilty of holding those
same ideals over my younger brother’s head, who does not want to go to college at
all and is happy doing exactly what he is doing.
Csikszentmihalyi writes about how
striving for goals and accomplishments are a big part of happiness, but
learning to “have control over the quality of experience” (page 22) is half the
battle. Balancing the two is the hard
part. Each contradicts each other so
without knowing it one could easily cancel out the positive effects of the
other. On page 8 he writes that “How we feel about ourselves, the joy we get
from living, ultimately depend directly on how the mind filters and interprets
everyday experiences.” This statement describes the importance of that balance.
Relating this to my personal experience is interesting and fun to think about.
Even though I do make a conscious choice to enjoy the present, it is all for
the purpose of something I have planned for the future.
Csikszentmihalyi
writes that “prolonged experiences of this kind can weaken the self to the
point where it is no longer able to invest attention and pursue its goals”
(page 37). What amazes me is how
concentration is something we can learn to build and get better at using, but
thoughts that disrupt concentration are so much harder for us to learn how to
control.
Within each element that make up
enjoyable experiences one uses concentration, psychic energy and control to
attain a goal that is reachable by their standards. The process might not be pleasurable, but the
feeling of accomplishment afterward is fulfilling. This process can border on positive or negative. Csikzentmihalyi talks about how the
exhilaration can be addictive and one might lose control of it. He writes, “Optimal
experience is a form of energy, and energy can be used to either help or
destroy” (pg 69). Criminals are one example of where the addictive power of
flow was used negatively rather than positively. The energy created by flow is not categorized
as good or bad.
The argument that what people
find enjoyable will never be the same and can never be controlled. Even
scientists that partake in enjoyable, seemingly positive flow could be
contributing to something ultimately bad for someone or something else. This factor adds even more complication to
what it takes to create an optimal experience.
Comments